Article Text
PDF
Statistics from Altmetric.com
A total hysterectomy is a common procedure. According to published data, in the European Union, laparoscopic and laparoscopic-assisted hysterectomies are performed more frequently than abdominal hysterectomies.1 A new technique in endoscopic surgery is the natural orifice approach—vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES). Performing a hysterectomy using the vNOTES method has a number of advantages compared with the traditional one, including a decrease in the intensity of pain in the early postoperative period, the absence of a cosmetic defect on the anterior abdominal wall and improved visualisation, which reduces the risk of intraoperative complications.2 This type of surgery is a combination of vaginal access as well as single-port endoscopic technique. Due to the vaginal approach, vNOTES is associated with no risk of infection, postoperative hernia or dehiscence of sutures on the anterior abdominal wall compared with the laparoscopic one.2 3
The operation was carried out at the clinical base of Bashkir State Medical University, Ufa, Russia. The course of the operation involves two stages: vaginal and laparoscopic (video 1).
The vaginal stage includes anterior and posterior colpotomies, the intersection of the cardinal and uterosacral ligaments and the installation of a port for subsequent laparoscopy via vaginal access.
This is followed by the installation of the port and the beginning of the laparoscopic stage of the operation. In our practice, we use a four-port laparoscopic system. The vNOTES operation does not require the Trendelenburg position, as with traditional laparoscopy; we only use it for patients with a body mass index greater than 35.
The laparoscopic stage includes the intersection of the uterine arteries, round ligaments and the ovarian ligament or infundibulopelvic ligament, as well as the revision of the pelvic organs (figure 1).
Ligation of the vascular bundle containing the uterine artery with an electroligation instrument. Cervix is in craniolateral position.
If a tumour is present, it is removed by endobag in compliance with the rules of ablastics. If there are indications for uterine appendage removal, it can be easily done via the vNOTES approach (video 1). The endoscopic stage ends with a haemostasis check, deflating and removing the portal system. Finishing the operation with peritonisation and suturing of the vaginal mucosa. The vaginal stage may include various colpoperineal plastic surgeries, simultaneously.
Supplemental material
Data availability statement
Data are available upon request.
Ethics statements
Patient consent for publication
Ethics approval
This study involves human participants and was approved by the Bashkir State Medical University Local Ethics Committee, Protocol No. 10 15.12.2021. Participants gave informed consent to participate in the study before taking part.
Supplementary materials
Supplementary Data
This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.
Footnotes
Contributors IIM and EAB performed the surgery and recorded the video. DNO edited the video. ZTG and GKM wrote the draft. AGY reviewed the draft and supervised the final video. All authors approved the final edition. EAB is the author responsible for the overall content as the guarantor.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Disclaimer Conclusion of the local ethics committee of BSMU the ongoing scientific research complies with generally accepted moral standards, the requirements of respecting human rights, interests and personal dignity of the patient participating in the study (Bashkir State Medical University Local Ethics Committee, Protocol No. 10 15.12.2021).
Competing interests IIM has served as an editorial member of GOCM. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.